Consider the options of infringement of the principles

1.The principle of quality determines what the dialogue will be to provide information that they consider is truthful. The violation of this principle creates a lie. Returning to the difficulties of definition of this phenomenon, we can say that the lie is deliberate, covert manipulation of the quality of the transmitted information.

2. The principle amount is based on the expectation that the contribution of the participants in the dialogue will be as informative as the situation requires. Violation of this principle, well describes the deceit, concealment and silence.

3.The principle of manners is based on the expectation that the other person will present the information clearly and in a manner that fits the situation. Violation of this principle, well describes the situation, when a person tries to mislead the interviewee by transmitting information in an ambiguous and unclear manner.

4. The principle of relevance is based on the expectation that the other person can provide information relevant to the issue, and will not deflect the conversation from its essence. The violation of this principle fits under the term "subversive response" (Turner, 1975), in which the interlocutor redirects the conversation, deflecting it from dangerous facts.